На головну

Discourse Interpreting

  1. An overview of socio-cultural theory in discourse
  2. DEFINITION OF DISCOURSE. The difference between text and discourse
  3. Discourse markers
  4. Interpretation of 'Discourse' from Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective
  5. Literary Discourse

After these remarks on what the process of translation is, I intend, from now on, to focus this discussion on translation as a communication activity and not as a mere product, involving the negotiation of meanings between producers and receivers of a text. In this sense, the discussion on translation activities goes far beyond the linguistic aspects underlying a text but it regards the social, cultural and psychological dimensions of the process. Thus, the translation activity should be studied as a discursive practice, where different reflexive actions are performed, such as: reading, interpreting, analysis, making decisions and others, which surpass the level of words and sentences reaching the level of discourse.

According to Fairclough (1992), discourse is the relationship between text and social practice. He conceptualizes discourse in three important dimensions: text, discursive practice and social practice (Figure 2). Shortly, we could say that the text is the discursive event, the central part of the discourse which deals with the linguistic aspects of the language; the discursive practice is related to the text production, distribution and consumption of the text and involves the analysis of the text as discourse - the interpretation of ideas which brings about the social function of a text; and finally, the social practice establishes the relationship between discourse and the social structure as a whole - how the discourse articulated by the text may affect current society, by changing values, behavior, concepts, etc.

1   2   3   4   5   6

Lecture 1 | DEFINITION OF DISCOURSE. The difference between text and discourse | Literary Discourse |

© um.co.ua - учбові матеріали та реферати